Supreme Court — Judgments of 1980

375 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1980 — page 4 of 4.

  • AKHLAQ AHMAD v. KARACHI PORT TRUST 1980 SCMR 810

    Section 42 is a declaratory suit for a claimant who claims to be the tenant of the property in dispute and is backed by the owner, Asuka Property Trust Board, however, no evidence to support the distr…

  • DADA SONS v. BENGAL OIL MILLS LTD. 1980 SCMR 813

    Article 73 and Martial Law Regulation, paragraphs 8 [8 [[CLA] s] No. st 42 [Reorganization as Status], read paragraph 2 and 4 price control with paragraph 11 that violate the agreement that paragraph …

  • MAJEEDA BEGUM v. DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER-II, 1980 SCMR 827

    Cancellation of Section 29 Allotment No proper notice of demand has been submitted, without legal authority, cancellation of transfer, [natural justice, principle]…

  • MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM HALEEM CHISHTI v. PAKISTAN COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH 1980 SCMR 831

    Article 185 (3) allows the Central Service Tribunal to appeal the dismissal of a public servant's claim of his being a public servant. The petition was not challenged before the Supreme Court's order …

  • ABDUL AZIZ BEG v. MUSHTAQ AHMED SHEIKH 1980 SCMR 834

    Section 13 Tenants Fleet to Pay Rental Source Advance on the First Part of Every Month, Withdrawal Request for Default Payment for Rental Payment, Default Tenant The questions have to be decided in ad…

  • MANDIWALLA ESTATES LTD. v. GOVERNMETN OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1980 SCMR 838

    Article 42 Declaration Suit The question is whether the Provincial Government can impose and recover property tax in respect of property in the cantonment area which has been inflamed by the petitione…

  • CAORU CINENA v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 SCMR 838

    Section 42 Declaration Suit The question is whether a license fee can be obtained from cinemas within the limits of the Cantonment Board, under the President's Order 1979 1979 1979 1979, the Cantonmen…

  • GUL v. THE STATE 1980 SCMR 839

    Articles 148, 302/149 [murder case] Definition of evidence sent to the Medical Superintendent by Chemical Examiner advising him to exclude the article related to the crime, which will be given on 4-4 …

  • QADAR DAD v. SHER MUHAMMAD 1980 SCMR 843

    Inheritance for change of proceedings to section 1 561A The powers conferred by section 1 561A cannot be exercised in such a way that the usual procedure may be constrained or diverted as per the rule…

  • MUHAMMAD ESSA v. STATE 1980 SCMR 848

    Sections 300, Exceptions I and 304, Part I [Murder Case] The value of the evidence and the sudden provocation saw the incident from beginning to end and the alarm alarm reached the house but spot insp…

  • LAI MUHAMMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 SCMR 850

    R5 (,), () dismissal of service cause, giving the officer authorized inquiry bond to have full details of the charges against the relevant authorized officer without giving any reason for such allegat…

  • PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES v. ALLAH DITTA BUGTI 1980 SCMR 855

    Rr 12 (a) and 12 (b) 7, the government-issued government employee Lane Letter is responsive to the respondents, demonstrating to them the entitlement of someone in their department, at the same time a…

  • BEVI v. GHULAM SHABBIR 1980 SCMR 859

    Article 4 (185 ()) Appeal against the Proof of Evidence [Murder Case] Blood was recovered from the scene of death as well as a bicycle containing documents relating to the enmity between the accused a…

  • K. M. K. A. ZAI v. COMMISSIONER 1980 SCMR 869

    Section 5 Delay Troubleshooting The applicant was completely misunderstood. And the application has been declared eligible for removal…

  • KISHWAR SULTAN JEHAN BEGUM v. M. A. WASTI 1980 SCMR 870

    O XXVI Chief Justice and Special Judge for a Bench of Two Judges Review Correcting the Error of Appeal, but the order dismissing one of the Chief Justice's signed and dismissed judges was presented be…

  • SARDAR MIR USMAN TAREEN v. MUHAMMAD HASSAN & SONS 1980 SCMR 871

    O VI, r 17 The law governing the petitioner may always demand modification of his petitions, provided he agrees with the court retention case.…

  • MUHAMMAD BAKHSH v. ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) 1980 SCMR 872

    Reading with Settlement Scheme No 9 Finding vacant land settlement officials and applicants who did not occupy the HC disputed land did not show any evidence that could include any false statements or…

  • AHMAD DIN v. NAWAB BIBI 1980 SCMR 873

    Inheritance in agricultural land When the Supreme Court is declared invalid by the order of the criminal court, the order of the criminal court is neither relevant nor valid evidence nor their evidenc…

  • JAHANA v. GHULAM ALI 1980 SCMR 875

    S5 Delayed Appeal Appealed 105-Day Appeal Unable to Explain Seriously Long Delays nor Appeals for Special Leave to Exclude Appeal for No Demand for Delayed Comfort…

  • ABDUL RAZAQ v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 1980 SCMR 876

    Article 212 An issue that does not involve a particular question about the law of public importance cannot be relieved. Is granted in such case…

  • MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. IMAM BAKHSH 1980 SCMR 879

    Section 100 Second Appeal Stoopel's Request for Reasoning cannot be taken notice of by the High Court in the second appeal as a fact petition [Estoppel]…

  • MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN v. MUKHTAR FIRDOUS 1980 SCMR 882

    Section 20 held that the Chief Settlement Commissioner passed the order in contravention of the Order and in such order the Chief Settlement Commissioner passed the Order in accordance with the Settle…

  • GHULAM ABBAS v. STATE 1980 SCMR 885

    Section 6 326 and I 30 murder (I) Criminal murder is not the amount of murder that can be reasonably considered to be the cause of injury to a person with a knife or to the left of the affected person…

  • MUHAMMAD YUSUF v. ASGHAR HUSSAIN 1980 SCMR 886

    Section 13 Withdrawal Agreement Denies the interest of the tenant landlord and the landlord, and there is no specific and explicit denial of the relationship between the parties to the landlord and th…

  • MARDAN ALI v. GULISTAN 1980 SCMR 889

    Clause 185 (3) and the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/34, were taken on the basis of careful testimony of the evidence taken by the High Court against the murder trial and the reasonable l…

  • ZAKAULLAH v. SULTAN JEHAN BEGUM 1980 SCMR 896

    The petitioner's appeal was dismissed by the High Court for illegal prosecution on the petitioner's request for Article 185 (3), read with OLLI, R 19, Section 151 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973). …

  • ABDUL MAJEED MEMON v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 SCMR 897

    Article 212 (3), read with Government of West Pakistan Department of Health Notification No. SO (VI) 10 9/66 dated 6 4 1966, Appeals from the Supreme Court to the Administrative Tribunal on Items 7 an…

  • GUL MUHAMMAD v. HASSAN KHAN 1980 SCMR 900

    Article 4 ((()) Appeal Leave not to be raised in opposition to the respondents to the question raised before the Supreme Court - the appeal was decided against them even though the basis of the regula…

  • SALEHON v. STATE 1980 SCMR 901

    SC 302/34 and 325/34 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3), the trial court denied his testimony of the eyewitnesses on the basis of the impeachment and acquittal of the accused appeals but…

  • NIAZ MUHAMMAD v. ABDUR RASHID 1980 SCMR 904

    The General Clause Act (X of 1897), the notice of restitution of property given to the son of section 27 transfer, and the fact that he was brought to his knowledge, could not be termed defective.…

  • UMAR DIN v. FAZAL MUHAMMAD 1980 SCMR 906

    Section 13 (2) (iii) To record the fact that the tenant courts evacuated the value or the material defect of the utility, together with the fact that the tenant removed the two doors between the two r…

  • MAQBUL AHMED TABBASAM v. STATE 1980 SCMR 907

    Article 188 Review Only after the full consideration of the evidence was summoned to the extent of rejection of the plea rejected, the power of review, pending, is not the purpose of trial [Supreme Co…

  • MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. STATE 1980 SCMR 908

    Section 218 is not liable to be paid by a public servant for the purpose of preparing a false record and to exclude the names of persons responsible for repaying such men, in which the applicant Clear…

  • FARZAND ALI v. PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTANCONTEMPT APPLICATION FILED BY FATEH YAB ALI KHAN ADVOCATE, 1980 SCMR 909

    Article 188 review by Supreme Court review cannot lie on its basis if the court had adopted a different view [Review by Supreme Court] Article 188 Supreme Court review by review is not based on mere e…

  • SHABBIR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1980 SCMR 920

    In support of the petitioner's plea by the petitioner, section 497 of Alibi's prosecution witnesses granted bail, directed to be released on bail in the case of [Alibi]…

  • GHULAM RASOOL v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1980 SCMR 921

    Settlement Scheme No. VIII Settlement Scheme No. VIII Remarks by Appellate Authority to Examine Transferring Parties' Rights in Trial Laws Cannot Define Property Available to Existing Properties Befor…

  • ZAMMARUD v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1980 SCMR 923

    The schedule, Part 1 Building in which three units and each unit are set up separately by the Settlement Authorities, is not capable of turning over questions of disputed fact and deciding without evi…

  • FAUJI FOUNDATION v. SHAMIMUR REHMAN 1980 SCMR 924

    Arts, ? (185 ()), leave to appeal the legislature that the legislation can be legislated against the primary fax regarding the writ petition filed by the Federal Court and the Supreme Court regarding …

  • SHER MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL RASHID 1980 SCMR 928

    In the exercise of the powers under Sections 10 and 11 the transfer of the deputy chief district commissioner of the property, without applying his mind and making his own decision in the case, relies…

  • NAZIR AHMAD v. RIAZUL HAQ 1980 SCMR 931

    Sections 13 and 15 of the High Court Landlord on any question regarding the personal use / necessity of the shop on the evacuation and the participation of evidence in the relevant record of the Distr…

  • PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. AZMATULLAH 1980 SCMR 932

    Section 13 (6) 8t 15 Read with the West Pakistan Request for Intangible Property (Temporary Powers) Act (VII of 1956), section 11 for collection of rent-controlled monthly rent and arrears of rent. Or…

  • GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. MOOR BIBI 1980 SCMR 933

    Article 199 The final outcome of the written jurisdiction is that the High Court cannot, in its limited constitutional jurisdiction, interfere with the conclusions sought by the evidence [fact finding…

  • ABDUL MAJID v. STATE 1980 SCMR 935

    Sections 21 and 30 confessed witnesses testified to several parts of the applicant's confessional offense, admitting that he was a member of the criminal gang and traveled by bus to the robbery commis…

  • INAYAT MASIH v. STATE 1980 SCMR 937

    Section 302 Section 104 murder read with private defense, no direct or circumstantial evidence to support the defendant's plea, except that his own ICC will show nothing on the record that the accused…

  • ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. M. K. JASKANI 1980 SCMR 940

    Article 212 (3) The applicant for a service matter fails to identify any order or communication in which the service tribunal fails to disclose the above facts regarding the misrepresentation but the …

  • VIDAYABAI v. MOORAJMAL 1980 SCMR 944

    Section 302/34 read with the Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898); Section 417 the offender was acquitted of the benefit of the doubt by the High Court because of the existence of a reasonable probabili…

  • AZIZAN BIBI v. ABDUL RASHID 1980 SCMR 945

    The jurisdiction of Article 1993 under Article 199 of the Constitution examining the validity of the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of the High Court granted under the Article Article 199 of the Con…

  • SAIDUR REHMAN v. STATE 1980 SCMR 950

    Article 185 (3) read with panel code (XLV of 1860), S, 302 and 300, the accused acquainted with the previous repetition, special leave for the opposition, who had previously come to the scene meditati…

  • MANZOOR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD MUNIR 1980 SCMR 952

    Section 161 Disregarding material evidence when it comes to the search for facts, which is equivalent to a mistake of law [fact finding]…

  • NIAMATULLAH SHAH v. FARMANULLAH 1980 SCMR 953

    Section & 64 & document 65 Copies of Documents Identification Price Not Realized Recovery Neither did the secondary evidence prove their loss, duplicate receipt, holding, irrevocable proof and claim b…

  • REPUBLIC MOTORS LTD. v. M. ANWAR 1980 SCMR 954

    S516 A criminal seizure of criminal property, however, may be restored to a party from whom such rule of law may still be relinquished under special circumstances Respondent No. 1 because of the work …

  • FAZLUR REHMAN v. GHULAM HABIB 1980 SCMR 956

    Article 2 (185) fact question raised for the first time and to include an inquiry into the question which is being administered by the Supreme Court.…

  • INTERHOM LTD. v. NISAR AHMAD KHAN 1980 SCMR 958

    Section 13 ()) (i) (a) Own personal property acquired by a tenant after the deceased has died, but the tenant is the tenant who claims to be the tenant of the land, In, the defendant accepts that he o…

  • AHMAD DIN v. SYRAN BI 1980 SCMR 959

    The first schedule is read with Article 162 Section 12, which has been approved in the revised application for a certified copy of the order of the High Court. The High Court review application, in ci…

  • EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 5TH PROVINCIAL BUILDINGS DIVISION, LAHORE ETC. v. COMBINED TRADERS, LAHORE 1980 SCMR 961

    O VI, r 17 Editing questions Whether or not a question is allowed to edit, under the discretion of the trial, the court cannot interfere with the exercise of such discretion unless it is distorted.…

  • GHULAM RASUL ETC v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER,GUJRANWALA 1980 SCMR 962

    The requirements of r5 were not observed in the filing and processing of the XXVL r 5 petitions, on the basis of which there was an exception to compliance with the rule that the applicant was very ma…

  • FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION v. HASSAN MEHMOOD 1980 SCMR 963

    Article 199 (4) (A) discusses the High Court's order to suspend the Federal Land Commission's order of disputes, the court is already bound to the matter, legal and constitutional position should be b…

  • SULTAN JAN KHAN v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 1980 SCMR 964

    Delay in delay, disobedience to the law, no delay, no apology, no apology will be granted before the Supreme Court.…

  • NIAZ MUHAMMAD v. NOORI 1980 SCMR 965

    The Section 113 Review High Court recognizes the application by the appellate court only to examine the effect of the failure to speak on the issue of suit pricing for the purpose of court fees. High …

  • ABDUL JALIL v. KHAN BAHADUR 1980 SCMR 967

    Section 67 Mortgage Prediction to Mortgage Your Land with B in 1915; Redemption and Suit to Build New Mortgage of the Same Property in 1976 for C to Announce That They Have Been in Controversy for Ove…

  • KRISHAN LAI v. AZIZULLAH KHAN 1980 SCMR 969

    S13 (3) Ejaculation Personal Needs Question Whether the landlord justified his need, held it, held a 14 mind question about the law and facts law and the question of fact]…

  • EHSAN-UL-HAD v. THE PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 1980 SCMR 972

    Article 212 ()) holds that the educational qualification required for the post of Assistant Medical Officer, which is to be given higher level and lower scale to L-section MF or medical technician, L-…

  • MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH v. FAIZ MUHAMMAD 1980 SCMR 974

    Section 13 (3) (ii) (a) Requires Dwarves Weapons The landlord is requesting evacuation based on the need for a shop for his own use, and his four sons, Landlord, have at the same time disputed a contr…

  • INAYAT KHAN v. SAZAN 1980 SCMR 976

    The case of section 11 race jostata two suits is found to be the same High Court under which two courts are simultaneously searched after which the judicial decision is stayed, the High Court decision…

  • BASHIR AHMAD v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, MULTAN& BAHAWALPUR DIVISION 1980 SCMR 978

    Article 199 reads with the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (Schedule XXVIII of 1958), Part I, refuses to move more applicants in its possession, the matter being settled by the…

  • HAZOOR BAKHSH v. WADDON 1980 SCMR 979

    Section 302/34 appeal of the murder remains on the evidence of only two witnesses, and on the truth of the testimony which is not the fault of the law in detecting the High Court. Appeal against acqui…

  • S. PIN LIU v. MRS. NAJMA KAZMI 1980 SCMR 983

    Sections 2 (d), 11 and 13 Acquisition of a building Part 2 (d) and 11 Some part of an adjoining residential building shall be converted into commercial use by the tenant without the written consent of…

  • BASHIR AHMAD SAJID v. ZAHEER AHMAD 1980 SCMR 985

    The abduction / abduction case was registered four years ago for forcing a married couple to read with section 561, the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), sections 366, 368 and 376, but practically no progre…

  • MUHAMMAD ASIAM KHAN v. GOHAR AMAN 1980 SCMR 988

    Article 3 (185 ()) Three unanimous instructions to transfer the shares of the plaintiffs applicants who have been deposed to the respondents in the suit land otherwise the applicant will be handed ove…

  • GUL HASSAN v. HAYATULLAH 1980 SCMR 989

    A. XXVI Review areas that are reviewed: (i) in view of the error record, (ii) some important statements were omitted and sold by the plaintiff's son to the plaintiff's son in association with the plai…

  • NISAR HUSSAIN v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE 1980 SCMR 991

    Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction cannot be applied to perform the duties already performed.…

  • MUHAMMAD RAFI v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 1980 SCMR 993

    Section 17 Disposal Procedure Landlord and Tenant Controversy In which the defendants are formally declared as the landlord of the applicants without specifying the issue without issue, the whole matt…

  • FARID v. ABDUL AZIZ 1980 SCMR 996

    Section 6 Applicant has not filed any request for filing of LH form for transfer of evacuation house as it is a building site and subsequently the applicants themselves are taking permanent constructi…

  • INAMULLAH KHAN v. LAHORE CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., LAHORE 1980 SCMR 998

    The Award 54 Award was passed several times and it was jointly argued that the applicant can only be paid as a liability under the award for which he stands on bail and not the whole. Is for money, wh…

  • ALLAH DINO v. ISLAM-UD-DIN 1980 SCMR 15

    OXXI, rr 58 & 63 On the attached object the object was tiled against the attachment but was also excluded from review against such order and objected to the failure to file any case pursuant to the pr…

Other years — Supreme Court

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.