Supreme Court — Judgments of 1976
303 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1976 — page 2 of 4.
- ABDUL GHANI v. NAWAB DIN 1976 SCMR 221
Allow Art ? ((()) Appeal) but the Appellant failed to submit valid statements despite the letters of record from his solicitor and taking direct notice from the court and the appeal for security submi…
- ALLAH RAKBI v. ALAM BIBI 1976 SCMR 222
The dispute involves a shed, part of the House, consisting of two parts, one room containing three rooms in the appellant's possession, and the other part containing two rooms in the possession of the…
- MUBARIK HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD KHAN 1976 SCMR 226
Article 199 The Writing Settlement Commissioner relies on certain documents that are not part of the record at the time of argument and respondents have no opportunity to meet with additional evidence…
- SHAH NAWAZ v. NIAMAT ALI BEG 1976 SCMR 227
Sections 10 and 11 pre-empted claimants to cancel applicants' claims from lodged applicants had the preferential right to allot such land if the surviving defendants could not claim priority \ claiman…
- COLONY SARHAD TEXTILE MILLS LTD.,RAWALPINDI v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1976 PLD 227
First Schedule, Item 15 Reads with an Explanation 6 Tax overhaul charges that Explanation 6 cannot increase the item's cost-effective delivery of an unambiguously yarn count with less than 355 fabrics…
- JAVID IQBAL v. MUZAFFAR KHAN 1976 SCMR 229
Section 13 (6) disclosure of rent payments The default tenant was ordered to collect the monthly monthly rent at a fixed rate before a certain date each month but failed to collect such rent regularly…
- AKBAR v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE 1976 PLD 231
Section 35 and Settlement Scheme No. 1, Para 22 Rent Estimation Review Reaching a fair and equitable decision regarding the cost assessment, the Chief Settlement Commissioner in any way disposes of an…
- HASAN MUHAMMAD v. MEMBER, BARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB 1976 SCMR 233
Section 21 (2) of the Land Exchange Section 21 does not consider the structure of any scheme for the purchase, lease, transfer, or otherwise of any land, nor does the law of any person transfer. Allow…
- TAJ MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD YUSUF 1976 PLD 234
Section 2 302/34 case [murder case] Appeal against evil, open murder, in daylight, and thus no one is heeded. The recovery of the bloody clothes and blood-stained crime was reinforced; the spree, the …
- NUR ALI v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 1976 SCMR 234
Poetry, Randers' Gift of Faith is Not Just Irregular and False With Gift Physical Possession Shared with the Land Without Poison Theory Without Distribution [Gift]…
- MUKHTAR AHMAD v. SHAH MUHAMMAD 1976 SCMR 237
Article 2 (185 (etition)) Applicants have failed to comply with their move to surrender the area twice in their illegal occupation and manage to retain possession of the disputed site in which they ow…
- MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. NISAR & CO. 1976 SCMR 239
Section 52 Maximum Pendent Liability Innovator (pending litigation should not be introduced) Neither party to real estate litigation can be separated from or dealt with by the property litigation ligh…
- MUHAMMAD MOHSIN KHAN v. MARYAMBIBI 1976 SCMR 241
The defaulted part, I have read with the Settlement Scheme No.1, Para 4 of the respondents' NCH form, without notice, the transfer order in favor of the applicant in the dismissed application and its …
- GHULAM MUHAMMA v. ALLAH YAR 1976 PLD 241
Section 2 302 // 34 was read with Section I, 300 I, the Exemption and Livestock Act (of 1871), sections 10 and 24, for the release of livestock with appropriate leave to the pound or farm. Use crimina…
- HIDAYAT ULLAH v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND) 1976 SCMR 243
Section 11 Res Judita is the nature of the affected order management, which makes the complaints crazy. The Collector of the Martial Law Administration, while passing the order, did not even go to the…
- HIRJINA & C. LTD. KARACHI v. S. A. MATIN 1976 SCMR 247
Section 79 The architectural demolition of a dangerous building of a municipal corporation finds parts of a controversial building to be hazardous, by a divisional commissioner (appellate authority) t…
- ATTA MUHAMMAD v. CHHUTTA 1976 SCMR 250
Section (()) Appeals from the Appellant's Prime Minister to Appeal to the Prime Minister's Court on 3 53 53 Against the Exclusion of His Complaint by Prime Minister. The states of Pakistan are conside…
- CHAIRMAN, ELECTRICITY WAPDA, LAHORE v. CH. MUHAMMAD SHAFI, ADVOCATE 1976 PLD 254
Under Section 25 Contract Act (I of 1872), Section 23 contract WAPDA has been authorized to change the prices of electricity under section 25. (2) Keeping in view (for defeating large-scale pilafrize …
- JAMSHED ALL v. PAKISTAN 1976 SCMR 255
Section 2 (1) (b) and 12 civil servants act (LXXI of 1973), section 2 (1) (b) and 12 notices employees are posted on a temporary or post-office or grade-ad hoc basis. Without notification, in his lowe…
- GUL ZEMAN v. ABDUL MALIK 1976 SCMR 257
Article 185 does not include any legal point of public importance technical…
- CHAIMAN DISTRICT SCREENING COMMITTEE, LAHORE v. SHARIF AHMAD HASHMI 1976 PLD 258
Sections 3 and 4 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5, 6, 7 Part III Deletion of service Many repeated appeals to the government employee responsible for the suspension, extension or suspens…
- MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. LAB DIN 1976 SCMR 260
Section differences 68 Dispute Resolution There is no new difference between the parties arising out of the final and non-conflict of the divisional canal officer, except for sowing or growing crops, …
- YAR BEG v. GUL NAZ 1976 SCMR 261
Section 25 Detention of Minor Parties, Applicable to Divorce by the Wife Applicable to the Family by the Husband, Applicant to the Family Court, Family Court for the custody of the minor sons residing…
- MUHAMMAD AZBAR KHAN v. SERVICES TRIBUNAL, ISLAMABAD 1976 SCMR 262
Article 212 Appeal to the Supreme Court Only the Service Tribunal's order lies on the question of the law of public importance before it is delayed in filing an appeal before denial by the Services Tr…
- HUSSAIN BIBI v. MUBARAK HUSSAIN 1976 SCMR 263
Schedule, purchase of a shareholder house certified claim, adjusting the price of the house, the house transferred it to Tea and PTD filed a complaint after 7 years, alleging fraud. The release of the…
- ADMINISTRATOR, HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL v. REHABILITATION COMMISSIONERS 1976 SCMR 265
Section 18 Pakistan (Administration for Equity Properties) Act (XII of 1957), Section 41 (2) This declaration on the nature of property 28 12 Custodian for declaration under section 18 to the applican…
- YUSAF HUSSAIN SIDDIQI v. ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR 1976 SCMR 268
Article 212 (3) Appeals to the Supreme Court by order of civil service tribunal lie only if any specific question of law of public importance is involved and all relevant documents have been properly …
- GHULAM NABI v. HAJIRAN BIBI 1976 SCMR 269
Article Dec 42 Declaration Suit The defendant asked in a number of examinations whether he had a divorce and no other question was answered in the affirmative whether he would be able to present a div…
- AMIN SOAP FACTORY v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1976 PLD 271
Sections 2 and 3? It is alleged that the court certificate was tampered with in favor of empty mortgages, the names of two other property associates (not the adjudicators) have been included in the sa…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. THE SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER MIANWALI 1976 SCMR 272
Article 187 was read with the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), delay in section 5, even the statement of the facts stated by the applicants o 7 statement of facts relating to his own illness, timely appli…
- ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. MAHMOOD ALI KASURI 1976 SCMR 273
Article 4 read with read4, Speech of contempt of court members in the Supreme Court with Arts, 68, 68 68 and te Con, humiliating statement of the court made by the defendants on the floor of the Natio…
- ALLAH BAKHSH v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE 1976 SCMR 275
Section 2 (4) and Schedule, the division of the First Housing Commissioner depends on the fact of the families of the persons having the property disputed and has been competing for several years with…
- ALLAH DITTA v. SHAHZADI BILQEES 1976 SCMR 282
Arts ? (185 ()) and ?7 Resp appeal to respondents of the Supreme Court to enter a warning against opposing the grant of leave, recognizing that the court's controversial injunctions, without keeping t…
- MUHAMMAD DIN v. RAWALPINDI IMPROVEMENT TRUST, RAWALPINDI 1976 SCMR 283
Article 187 was read with the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), delaying Section 5, the copy of the petition for the condolences of the applicant seeking review of the ground during the Central Appeal hear…
- NOOR MUHAMMAD v. ABDUR RAZZAQ 1976 SCMR 286
Article 187 reads with Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 497, both sides taking firearms and using them against each other to explain to the High Court the reasons for bailing the respondent…
- WALI MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1976 PLD 287
Sections 3 and 12? A. (1) Read the Central Government's notification number with section RO 1284 (k) / 66, 2? 12? 1966? Excise Duty? Exempt from payment? The government may exempt goods or class goods…
- AHMAD SHAH v. MUHAMMAD JAMIL 1976 SCMR 288
Article 4 (185 ()) leaves to appeal the authenticity of the sale process in dispute, and no case has yet been settled by trial. Suit on ability, held, unimaginable…
- PALTA v. ISLAMUDDIN 1976 SCMR 290
Section 19 Appeal Limit Petitioner Knowing the Fact of Cancellation of Property Transfer, Reinstatement of Property, and Purchase by Defendant Applying for a Pre-Order Order on 3 2 1971 1971, Transfer…
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL ALIAS JAVED IQBAL v. THE STATE 1976 PLD 291
Section 302/34? (Murder case) GG was shot dead while going to GG Summit to repair his bed? The prosecution's witness ji has admitted an independent witness that he testified about the presence of the …
- FEROZA BEGUN v. AMTUL FAROQ 1976 SCMR 291
O xxxix, r 1 injection, temporary registration cell deed in connection with the disputed house transfer, documents to show the transfer of the house in favor of the defendants, the first time the case…
- SAKINA BIBI v. SULTAN 1976 SCMR 292
Article 187 read with Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 498 Bail, Canceled Termination High It is not possible for the High Court to fire suddenly and whether the respondent accused shared a…
- PRVINCE -OF PUNJAB v. ABDUL AZIZ 1976 SCMR 294
Article 185 (()) read with Constitution of Pakistan (? 62 62 Pakistan), Article ondon 58 (?) Deletion of Delays 14 such appeals by the High Court hearing on the impugned appeals filed on the basis of …
- ABDUS SALAM v. ISHAQ 1976 SCMR 296
Article 187 reads with the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the termination of section 5 delays the nature of the applicant's illness as it does not have to be completely powerless to contact his lawyer, …
- PRVINCE F SIND v. GHULAM RASOOL 1976 SCMR 297
Article 178 (3) stipulates that the salaries of unskilled teachers be paid to the civil servants on a fixed time, which is stated in the notification of the Provincial Gazette, that there is no differ…
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. RAB NAWAZ 1976 PLD 298
Section 491? Habit Corporate? The minor appears to have been granted permanent residence of the appellants in another village under her father's custody and has married the appellant without her fathe…
- ABDUL GHAFR v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 1976 SCMR 299
Article 187 read with the Prohibition Act (IX of 1908), admitting the applicant's allegation of section 5 delay that he was unaware of the writ petition filed against him. Petition filed on 5 11 1975 …
- PIRAN DITTA v. THE STATE 1976 PLD 300
Section 302/149/148 [Case of Murder] Maxim: Innocence of credibility negligence, theory of murder in broad daylight, witnesses to three eyewitnesses, in a special report immediately filed at police st…
- MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1976 SCMR 300
A. XXVI, rr 3 and 5 and the First Schedule, CL (2) Revision Advocate M has directed, through Advocate on Record F, that the request for a special leave be neither drawn nor reviewed on the occasion of…
- SHAH NAWAZ v. AKBAR KHAN 1976 SCMR 302
FIR properly used at its discretion to allow respondents to cite Article 187 Criminal Code of Conduct (V910987, Section 498 Bail, High Court Canceled, Referred to Facts) And there is no compelling rea…
- MUHAMMAD-ASLAM v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1976 SCMR 303
Section 2 Schedule read with Part II ???? Shop Petitioner Transfer Exchange Unlike the fixed date of 20 coming 12 1958 in 1966, there is no compromise as stated in Section 2 applicants as there is no …
- KHAIR MUHAMMAD ALIAS KHAIROO v. THE STATE 1976 PLD 303
Section 2 302, ?88, ?99 read with sections & 34 & 3 323 [Case of Murder] The first informant to prosecute a weapon, not the personal injury caused by the individual injuries caused by each of the accu…
- ABDUL WAHID v. STATE 1976 SCMR 305
Section 7 case7 has been remanded to a Civil Judge for a new judgment regarding the granting of certain prints of the controversial film to the defendants and to disposing of the property involved in …
- SAEED-UN-NISA v. INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 1976 SCMR 306
Section 38 (1 Diagnosis Formula PLD 1969 is adopted as SC 123) and is exempt from the facts and circumstances of the case and is not a global request.…
- MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD GULZAR 1976 SCMR 308
Section 2 (4), first read by Provo with a schedule, consists of more than one residential unit in the Part L House Divestable House, and each such unit is occupied by a non-resident. The Chief Settlem…
- MUHAMMAD ZAKI v. MAQSOOD ALI KHAN 1976 PLD 308
OV, r 2 Review Courts, especially the High Courts, unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, always decide to hear the entire appeal on the merit from the debt court in favor of the determi…
- MUHAMMAD ZAKI v. MAQSOOD ALI KHAN 1976 PLD 309
OV, r 2 The various paragraphs of the judgment under review indicate that the Additional Settlement Commissioner, having omitted the paragraph of his order, filed a search for the respondents in which…
- M. A. MAJID v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1976 SCMR 311
Article 212 Director General (T&T) Memo No. Section 31 113/36 read with Dated 14 4 1970, Assistant Deputy Director General will be filled by the memo through development from the post director general…
- BASHIR AHMAD v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHRE 1976 SCMR 313
The Commissioner found that Shadette, the landlord's transfer case, did not form part of the residential portion of the property again under the dispute, and relocated an applicant to Reliance as a sh…
- MULAKH BANO v. GOHAR BANO 1976 SCMR 314
Section 102 and 103 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908) Proof of Appeal 96 Proof of Appeal Disclosure of Interference with Claimants Claiming to Interfere with the Claimant When she was divorced, Plaintif…
- ABRAR HASSAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1976 PLD 315
Article 207, read with Articles 181 and 1 82, does not consider the membership of both the High Court and the Supreme Court in the Constitution, except that in the two obvious situations set forth in …
- MACDONALD LAYTON & COSTAIN LTD. v. AVARI HOTELS LTD. 1976 SCMR 316
Article 185 (3) in the dispute was already taken before the High Court in appeal and the appeal was also admitted for hearing, after which the first High Court Petition should be decided for leave to …
- MUMTAZ BEGUM v. ABDUL AZIZ 1976 SCMR 317
Section 20 read with the Limitation Act (1X of 1908), the abolition of section 5 delays was dealt with under the Marking Scheme and under section 30, the Legal Notice under the Service for the Displac…
- MIR ZAMAN KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF LODHI 1976 SCMR 319
Schedule, Para 13 Building Site, Transfer of Applicants' Stance that It Already Built on Site When It Was Safe for Respondents When It Was Not Proved that Applicants Are Not Allowed in Controversy , T…
- NAZIR AHMED v. GHUIAM MUBAYYUDDIN 1976 SCMR 322
Article 1 Leave objections before appeal: Leave Supreme Court never raised before the High Court…
- ABDUL HAFEEZ v. SIRAJ DIN 1976 SCMR 323
Schedule, Part I Since January 1954, the controversial Chobra has not had any evidence on record to indicate that the applicant's survey register was available at any time as there was no reason to do…
- PRESIDENT SARHAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INSUSTRIES PESHAWAR CITY v. THE CHAIRMAN EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 1976 SCMR 326
Section 4 (3R) and (4) Appeal Trust Property Tons Question No No appeal under section 4 (3) and, (4) section A (3) 8T (4) only if The question that arises is whether or not the property is in the natu…
- SHAD MUHAMMAD v. MATTER HAMEED 1976 SCMR 328
Article 498 read with Constitution Pakistan (1973) Article 187 ~ Guaranteed murder case] The accused applicant remained absconding for two years but eventually the bail plea of surrendering himself wa…
- HAIDER v. GHULAM HAIDER 1976 SCMR 329
Article 58 Appeals were dismissed by Land Commission officials from individual facts, resulting in no interest in prosecuting the Appeal Council for one of the 309 defendants present, but such counsel…
- SALEEM HAYAT v. S. M. SALEH 1976 SCMR 332
Section 13 (6) read with Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), A XLI, r 25 The rent controller orders that the applicant submit to the tenant all the arrears previously amended in the appellate court so tha…
- AXIS KHAN v. AJAB KHAN 1976 SCMR 333
The claimant for a purchase of a dispute over the title of property owner, which was proved by a document issued by the Settlement Authorities in your person, then the plaintiff registered property de…
- AISHA BEGUM v. SOSAN BIBI 1976 SCMR 335
Section 15 Permanent Transfer Transfer Once a transfer is issued in favor of the transfer, it can only be classified on the basis of fraud or misrepresentation. No such charge can be settled, it canno…
- BABAR SHAH v. STATE 1976 SCMR 336
Article 97 Private defense, The right to a private defense player has not been taken before the trial. The nature of the injuries sustained by the co-accused is not supported by this case.…
- AMEER UMAR v. STATE 1976 SCMR 338
Section 1l8 Child Witness Section 118 does not recommend any questions that are placed to test the child's sensitivity to the court simply because the child witness is able to give rational answers to…
- INAM RUBBANI v. KHURSHID BEGUM 1976 SCMR 340
Sections 10 and 19 of the state grant land were resumed by the government without any notification to the respondents. The High Court upheld the Commissioner's order finding that the Board of Revenue …
- MARYAM BEGUM v. SHAH MUHAMMAD 1976 SCMR 342
Section 10 is read with the Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 10 of Article 41 Allotment 19, Section 10 of Act XLVII of 1919 is allowed to terminate fraudulent allotments and subject to confirmation …
- ALAMDAR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 1976 SCMR 347
O XXXIX, r1 injection, the temporary courts below, finding the existence of mutual exchange, complete the sale of the property in dispute by the claimant in favor of the respondents and the claimant u…
- KHAIR DIN v. ZAINAB BIBI 1976 SCMR 348
O XXVI The conclusions of the three jurisdictions under the auspices of the Jamabandi and the Permanent Court below are not justified in reviewing such results, there is no justification for reviewing…
- REHMAN DAD v. SAJAWAL KHAN 1976 SCMR 350
Section 7 reads with the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), the appointment of a Report of the Local Commissioner in the Section 75 Pre-Emission Suite Commissioner, Ore Impression Suite, if any, facili…
- ZAKAUALLAH v. STATE 1976 SCMR 352
Art 187 Guarantees Some Applicants Show Honorable People First Information Report containing the least common allegations against a large number of individuals, including the applicant, in which no al…
- MUHAMMAD MUNSHI v. STATE 1976 SCMR 354
Article 123 disputed affidavit of the appellant seeking injunction from the High Court by pretending to be occupied on the ground and threatening the respondents to forcibly expel, however, proved fal…
- M. INAYAT KHAN v. M. ANWAR 1976 PLD 354
Article 123 and the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 (2), the guilty plea of the High Courts is not only voiced by him, who disagreed with a particular view expressed by the Supreme Court …
- GHULAM MOHY-UD-DIN v. MANZR ELABI 1976 SCMR 356
Shade, the second shop reliever, claims to have allotted the shop and paid the rent, though there is nothing on the record, however, he has two receipts to support such a claim. To do so is to claim t…
- ABDUL GBANI v. NAWAB DIN 1976 SCMR 357
Article 3 (3 ()) advises that on the notice of the court not only the shares are approved by practicing fraud, but it is issued to explain the reason why the leave cannot be withdrawn.…
- MUHAMMAD AHMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1976 SCMR 358
Article 185 (3) Article 212 reads (3) Serviceable services are considered by the Administrative Courts and Tribunals Service Tribunal, which does not allow the applicant to avail himself of his previo…
- ZARIN v. STATE 1976 SCMR 359
Section 9439 Increase in revision penalty The question is whether the sentence should be increased in the review, depending on the circumstances of each case, should there be any principle of common p…
- SHAHID ARSHAD v. MUHAMMAD NAQVI BUTT 1976 SCMR 360
The counsel of the Supreme Court of section 7497 / Supreme88 was informed by the Council to inform the State that the proceedings of the inquiry would soon refuse to interfere with the High Court's re…
- IMAM ALI SHAH v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN 1976 SCMR 362
Under section 31 section under under, the statute of limitation required physical possession of the under-the-sale vendor allegedly occupying the land-tenant prior to the verification of the real phys…
- HABIBUR REHMAN v. SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT, RAWALPINDI 1976 SCMR 363
Schedule, paragraph 6 public auction document described as a token 141 Not being suggested under any law supplies or directives issued by the Chief Settlement Commissioner, conclusive proof of the auc…
- MANSOOR AHMAD BHATTI v. THE STATE 1976 SCMR 366
Section 497/498 The applicant for bail is neither designated as the original assailant nor as plotting in the first information report.…
- GUL MUHAMMAD v. STATE 1976 SCMR 367
Section 7 S7 Sodomy Medical Examination Reveals Annual Admission and Detection of the Affected Boy, Evidence of Prosecutor's Witness, Medical Evidence That Evidence of the Affected Boy Will Not Be Sup…
- AHMAD SHAH v. MUHAMMAD JAMIL 1976 SCMR 376
O XLI, r 23 There is no question as to the authenticity of the remand and the authenticity of the sale so that the construction house on the disputed site prior to the purchase of the site and such ma…
- AJMEER KHAN v. WAHID HUSSAIN 1976 SCMR 377
O xxxix, r 1 injection, temporarily turning the applicant into filing a declaration in relation to the same case and applying for a denial of a legal injunction, losing his case in litigation , Approv…
- TAJAMMAL HUSSAIN v. NASAR MEHDI 1976 PLD 377
Sections 299 and 302 Components of the murder offense: The result of death due to serious intent and injury…
- YAQUB HUSSAIN NAQVI v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1976 SCMR 378
Article ? (185 ()) Copy of the Appeal Request Against Being Ready To Provide Holiday 3 Days Appeal To Appeal To The Supreme Court There is no satisfactory explanation for the delay. Poor guy has no ex…
- MUHAMMAD YAMIN v. GHULAM MUSTAFA 1976 SCMR 379
The acquisition of the property under the contract of sale by the claimant Ain, or the continuation of the possession after entering into such agreement, the claimant having possession of the property…
- MUZAFFAR JAN v. HUSSAIN JAN 1976 SCMR 382
The successor widow was able to obtain the property as the limited owner of her deceased husband and later on the death of the widow by the transfer of the property to her daughter M (applicant) by 1/…
- IQBAL BEGUM v. HAJIRA BEGUM 1976 SCMR 383
Section 13, read with the Cowell Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXIX r 1 and the IDPs (Compensation and Rehabilitation Act (XX8II of 1958)), Section 34 has argued that the applicant has a disputed house…
- MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. NISAR & CO. 1976 SCMR 385
Section Max 52 Maxim: In any case, nothing new can be introduced for litigation. Neither party to the litigation can separate or deal with immovable property so that their opponents buy the land from …
- NASIR AHMAD v. KHUDA BAKHSH 1976 SCMR 388
Section 101 (2) and O XLI, rr 24 & 33 Appeal Court]…
- FAZAL DIN v. THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER 1976 SCMR 389
Schedule, Part I Transfer Claims to Prevent Asset Allocation Claims in the previous property record But no evidence of such effect is available on the record applicant but time to submit certified cop…
Other years — Supreme Court
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.