Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUZAFFAR JAN versus HUSSAIN JAN


The successor widow was able to obtain the property as the limited owner of her deceased husband and later on the death of the widow by the transfer of the property to her daughter M (applicant) by 1/8 of the share on her death. In which he transferred all of his inheritance, including his daughter.

1976 S C M R 382

Present: Salahuddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ

Mst. MUZAFFAR JAN‑Petitioner

Versus

Mst. HUSSAIN JAN AND OTHERS ‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 87‑R of 1975. decided on 25th November 1975.

(On appeal from the judgment and decree of the Peshawar High Court, dated the 12th of May 1975, in R. S. A. No. 46 of 1968).

Muhammadian Law‑--

--‑ Succession‑Widow succeeding to estate of her‑''deceased husband as limited owner and later transferring property to her daughter M (petitioner) by way of gift‑Widow's share of 1/8th on her death, held, devolved upon all her heirs including daughter.

Syed Muhammad Shehudul Haque, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for. Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 25th November 1975.

ORDER

SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J.

‑The petitioner has been aggrieved by an order of a learned Single Judge of the Peshawar High Court dismissing her second appeal.

The last male holder of the property in dispute was 'Mir Ahmad. On the death of Mir Ahmad his widow, Mst. Bakhtnoor succeeded to a limited estate. Mst. Bakhtnoor during her life time transferred the property to her daughter petitioner Mst. Muzaffar Jan by means of two gift mutations attested on the 1st and 27th of September, 1956.

Mst. Bakhtnoor died in 1965, and the remainder of her property was mutated in the names of hat heirs as follows:‑

Mst. Khanam Jan 1/16

Mst. Muzaffar Jan 9/16

Mst. Hussain Jan 6/16

It has been found that Mst. Bakhtnoor was only a limited owner She died in 1963 and according to the Shariat the 1/8th share that she has inherited in her husband's (Mir Ahmad's) property, devolved upon her heirs including Mst. Khanam Jan. There is, therefore, no suhatanss the contention that Mst. Khanam Jan could not inherit any part of the property of Mir Ahmad which devolved on her mother, Mst. Bakhtnoor.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Mubarik Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.