Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NASIR AHMAD versus KHUDA BAKHSH


Section 101 (2) and O XLI, rr 24 & 33 Appeal Court]

1976 S C M R 388

Present: Muhammad Yaqub Ali. C. J. and Muhammad Gul. J

NASIR AHMAD AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

versus

KHUDA BAKHSH AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 483 of 1974, decided on 14th November 1975.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Circuit, Baghdadul Jadid, dated 22‑4‑1974 in F. A. O. No. 36 of 1973).

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑

‑‑‑‑‑ S. 101(2) & O. XLI, rr. 24 & 33‑Appeal‑Appellate Court, powers of‑Appellate Court invested with same powers as Court below‑‑Sufficient material existing on record, appellate Court may itself decide issue nod determined by first Court.‑(Appeal (civil)].

Jari Ullah Khan, Advocate and Iqbal Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate‑on. Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 14th November 1975.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, C. J.

‑In an appeal in a pre‑emption suit the District Judge set aside the finding of the trial Judge on issue No. 4 pertaining to value of improvements made by the vendee and remanded the case for fresh trial but without adjudicating upon two other issues which had been answered in favour of the plaintiff‑respondent.

In a second appeal, a learned Judge in the High Court has, instead of interfering with the remand order, himself examined the evidence led by the parties on issues Nos. 1 and 5 and dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioners herein.

The learned counsel for the petitioners attempted to argue that the order passed by the District Judge had resulted in prejudice to his client inssm6ch as the High Court did not have the advantage of knowing how the District judge would have resolved these issues.

The contention raised is without any substance‑ The Civil Procedure Code specifically invests an appellate Court with the same powers as the Court below there are also provisions in Order XLI, C. P. C. to the effect that if there be sufficient material on the record the appellate Court may itself decide an issue which has not been determined by the first Court.

The petition for leave to appeal is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Jaranwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.