GENERAL MANAGER, MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., FAISALABAD versus NAEEM AHMED
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 2 (xxviii), 25A, 35 (5) (d) and 38 a complaint request that the employee be dismissed for employment as an employee of the employee on the grounds that he was dismissed. Was stolen with the intention of receiving a check. Money through fraudulent means challenged his dismissal by filing a complaint under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, the complaint filed by the employees was requested by the employee bank and the employee was told that the employee Cannot be treated as such and the matter is governed. In view of the fact that the Labor Board award was declared by the Wage Board under Section 38A of the Industrial Relations Commission, 1969 and that the Labor Court was not competent to decide the matter, the employer's dispute was therefore repelled. It was suggested that employees of nationally functioning banks and other financial institutions could be refunded. To the Labor Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
