Find a Lawyer

UNITED LABOUR UNION, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (INTER-CITY) DEPOT, MULTAN (C.B.A.) versus MUMTAZ ALI, ROCKET GROUP, UNITED LABOUR UNION, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (INTER-CITY) DEPOT

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15, 16, 22A (12), 38 and 53 An unfair labor practice In labor corporation, a group of labor unions prayed before the Labor Court that only 66 conductors were detained for duty on vehicles. Be taken in The corporation has ordered the removal of any other employee departing from various parts of the Labor Court to be appointed only to work on the conductors and if they fall short, the head office corporation in light of the order The services of the rest of the employees can be used. The court instructed the district manager not to allow other staff members to perform the duties of a conductor, which would favor all members of the labor union's rival group staff who acted as conductors. Must not be limited to compliant duty. Alone, the Appeal challenged the Labor Court order that the Labor Union / Appellant's rival group has not yet had a proper case as to their request about Utesa as the conductor of all staff members. The relative was concerned because the conductors were generally notorious because they earned from being involved in irregularities which also damaged the corporation's income and at the same time no court of public interest was in such a situation. Tolerate such protection. Those who were found to have committed unfair conduct did not have to issue a directive to the court in relation to the internal work of a government department or corporation when their executives and specialists were only allowed to perform their day-to-day work and nature. Had to discuss. Duties of their Subordinates patent advocate from Padidan lawyer