MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus DEPUTY ,DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, SHEIKHUPURA
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 Labor Court's response to the dismissal of the party applicants, who were not parties to the proceedings before the Labor Court, nevertheless dismissed it as an Applicant Applicant. Was enforced as a party to the application. That he was not a party to the proceedings before the Labor Court, the Labor Court used very harsh language against him in his decision and he was strongly condemned by the petitioner and the Labor Court Unilaterally, unpleasant and harmful observations and results were obtained against the applicants which could result in irreparable injury to the applicant's career. Such damaging and stringent remarks of the Labor Court should either be dismissed or the applicant should be empowered to present his / her explanation and defense before the Labor Court in the case that the appellate tribunal directed that the observations be made The record was filed by the Labor Court. In the judgment against the appellant, the applicant should take the matter of the department in remand. The remand of the case was taken on the basis that the Labor Court will not come to such conclusion against the applicant unless the applicant has At the hearing, the Labor Court did not come to the same conclusion again.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
