DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE, JHANG versus SHAHID JAVID AMIN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI VI; 1968); I was fired after inquiry. It was against the employee that he kept the postage for two months and did not provide it to the audience without any excuse. That he removed the blank check from a postal envelope from abroad. That he had sealed it and prepared a fake money order on which he had stolen or detained him from the custody of the employee holding him, in a fair and independent inquiry into his misconduct. Was found and could not establish any prejudice or prejudice in the matter of inquiry. Officer Labor Court, despite allegations that the allegations on which the employee was dismissed from the job was completely proved, had taken a softer and softer attitude that observed. Employees were not guaranteed the highest penalty award for dismissal. As a result of inadequate and dishonest performance, the employer / employee who was a postman could not be overlooked and the allegations leveled against the employee provided a valid basis for the execution of a major court-approved fines order. According to which the employees were reinstated. , Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
