Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus GENERAL MANAGER, PTC, CTR, LAHORE

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Complaint order was filed from senior officer's leave against the employee complaining of his qualifications, unsatisfactory work and irregularities, the employee was demanded To appear in the office test. That the position he held for his position could be reviewed by the fact that he had challenged the employee's employer's order in his complaint and the Labor Court issued a steel order in favor of the employee, After which the order was withdrawn that the employee only needed to be available for evaluation himself. Its performance / ability, but the employee refuses to take the test as instructed by the employer, thus, the employee involved in a process of total discipline authorized authority to pass the test for his / her performance or ability to qualify. And employees cannot deviate or disobey. Even if they were ordered to appear in the test, there was no reason to complain about the score and the job order. The authority was completely valid and reasonable and could not be challenged. immigration advocates email from Kotla Pathan lawyer