Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI versus AHSANUL HAQ

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 Employees who were employed as head cashiers at the bank were dismissed on the charge that they were to be received at the counter. The gas bill was then sent to Link Branch. After a break of weeks or months, the employee was issued a charge sheet and inquired into which he not only participated, but he also confessed with some explanation that the Labor Court had made the employees present. It was not a misappropriation of bankruptcy lawsuits against employees. But the delayed filing of the non-remittance amount for a day will also be temporarily misused under the law, there was sufficient documentary evidence in relation to the employee's misconduct and the employee through the proceedings The Commission acknowledged such misconduct until a detailed inquiry was not considered necessary and could even be disputed. The bank's situation was of critical nature and the client's money was paid to such employees. Could not be allowed to entrust to employees, admissions, supervision, forgery, and other such negligence When are the times when dealing with the Labor Court's cash judgment was re-introduced according to the employee put aside? best advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer