SHARAFAT ALI versus ZEENAT SHIRT FACTORY, S.F. UNIT NO.50, KARACHI
25 Relationships to the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 A & 37 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section and Re-Appeal for the Employment of 14 Returning Employees Rejected by the Labor Court ? The Labor Appellate Tribunal sent the management in relation to the employment of all re-employed employees jointly with all affected employees to deal with the law in accordance with the law on all matters involved in the dispute, including maintaining evidence requests by the parties. Had given. The Labor Court, on remand, dismissed the employees 'complaint request on the employee's initial legal objection, without recording the parties' evidence and ruling on all matters of law and fact, as directed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Cannot cure it under 25A. The Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, because their case was not against the termination of the job but the termination of the job as a result of the industrial dispute, each case involving a mixed question of law and fact, recorded only evidence on the initial legal objections. A decision could not be made without and without giving a verdict on all matters of law-breaking. The fact is that the labor court quickly reached the point of law without following the instructions of the Labor Appellate Tribunal, which was special and necessary, after recording evidence with other matters involved in the employee's affairs. The Labor Court should have decided the legal objections raised. Labor Appellate Tribunal accepts employees' appeals against Labor Court decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
