WALIMUHAMMADKHETRAN versus SARFRAZAHMAD
R12 inquiry proceedings was a judicial proceeding under the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1975, the inquiry officer / inquiry committee constitutes a civil court in the world and the evidence presented to the inquiry officer / inquiry committee It was important to give evidence about the evidence. Although the witness was to be recorded by the inquiry officer during the court proceedings. But swearing will not affect the admissibility of a witness's evidence. Permission to administer or certify a colleague to the officer, this was just an irregularity that could be treated by section 13 of the Ath to Act, 1873R. Investigation against the jurisdiction of the public servant appellate authority where the respondent was in charge, the appellant gave his personal hearing to the appellant as a competent authority and he was subsequently promoted to the post of secretary, the appellate authority. Could not work as the appeal was created after the final inquiry.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer