Find a Lawyer

SHAUKATALI,EXCISEANDTAXATIONINSPECTOR,FAISALABAD versus EXCISEAND TAXATIONOFFICER,SHEIKHUPURA

In its first inquiry report for stopping two-year increments imposed on section 4 mismanaged public servants, the public servant was acquitted of allegations of corruption, the competent officer prepared another report by the inquiry officer on the basis of Was fined for stopping. The modification of the inquiry report regarding the two-year increase at the request of the competent officer shows that the authorized officer was treated unfairly against a civil servant, thus cannot be relied upon by an authorized officer. The authorized officer could only order nine inquiries, in which the Inquiry Officer clearly indicated to the official officer's observations that he had directed the Inquiry Officer to illegally produce results against a civil servant even though the Inquiry Report Supplying a copy of was not a legal requirement, however. Until now, where a regular Inquiry Irish was being conducted, such a copy must be presented to the accused officer so as to enable him to respond to the allegations made by the Inquiry Officer. Government employees were not convicted of the charges against them, but the penalties imposed on civil servants were set aside under circumstances. immigration advocate from Phool nagar lawyer