Find a Lawyer

KHALID MEHMOOD versus DEPARTMENT OF POLICE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB RAWALPINDI

R 12 27 Employee's dismissal A public servant who was a constable in the police department was dismissed from the job after giving a personal hearing and after applying for a personal hearing, he applied for registration as a constable, revealing that he had cleared Pak He served in the Army for about two years. And that he failed to state that he was an Army offender, an Army certificate issued in favor of a civil servant indicated that civil servants could be taken to government service because the sentence awarded to them by the Summary Military Court. Not related to any immoral act. Part of the Army Certificate of Government Employees also indicated that the role of a public servant was good at the time of his dismissal from the Army Service and was suitable for any other police department under which the Police Rules, Regulations 1934 12 27 The dismissal was not denied by a public servant in the police department altogether, but it was required that such registration be ordered only with special sanctity as the Inspector General of Police, Police Constable. The hiring order of police personnel actually faced legal lacunae because the government employee inspector general The recruitment could not have taken place without the special approval of the police and unless the inspector general had personally listened to the police. Servants in favor of special approval in favor of the servant and public servants cannot be allowed to continue in service while accepting a public servant's appeal against dismissal of the job, and upon passing the final order, the Inspector General of Police is on remand. The lawsuit was filed. Punjab Police Rules advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer