TAJMUHAMMADKHAN versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL,EXCISEANDTAXATIONDEPARTMENT,PUNJAB,LAHORE
The charges for installing a public servant on the basis of which he was dismissed were: Non-compliance with the exchange order and absence of duty Inquiry officer was informed by the notice of the public servant that he was required Present in front Weeks to respond to the allegations against him, but the Inquiry Officer submitted his report within two days of the issuance of the notice, without waiting for a week, on behalf of the Inquiry Officer Keeping a period of time would be like denying civil. Servant of the appropriate opportunity who was entitled to it and because of this the inquiry officer was subjected to abortion that the public servant was deprived of his personal right, the order of dismissal was set aside and The matter was forwarded to the inquiry officer so he could proceed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Doaaba lawyer
