Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI versus MIR HASAN BUGHIO

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A Worker = Retained Complaint Request Employee who was a Grade II Officer and was appointed Manager of the Bank's main branch, after issuing a show cause notice. Dismissed, given a charge sheet and held. The inquiry into his allegations of corruption challenged his dismissal in his complaint filed under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, with sufficient evidence to show that The employee was the manager of the bank's main branch, not a bank officer and no laborer or laborer employee, as the Grade II officer was receiving Rs 3,040 in 1982 and as the manager in charge of the main branch of the bank employees. , Could accept the resignation of any employee working under it, approve or stop the hiring of employees. , Could dismiss and suspend employees, was thus administrative in nature and had the option of discharging staff members. As the manager of the employee who served under it, all such duties were manager, caretaker, and administrative and whatever academic duties, if performed by them, they would be as an employee's employee. The main duties of the accident were, without imagination, the employee is considered as the employee was a bank officer and not a worker, hence he will not govern through the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, Or a complaint filed by employees through the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance Or online advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer