Find a Lawyer

ZALIMAN SHAH versus ATLAS RUBBER AND PLASTIC INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) Employee services were terminated because employees were not required to terminate order on a two-way challenge by the employees. Firstly, there was no reason to consider the services under section O12 (3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, and secondly, the termination orders were volatile. As far as the first thing is concerned, the law is required. The reasons for termination of employment were to be stated, but it was not stated anywhere that the employees should be justified or justified. The termination of the job was simple and it could also be that the reasons for the restoration of the job were Whether or not to affect the economy. The service was no longer needed, so it was not unreasonable especially when the employee was offered notice pay and other legal liabilities as far as the second basis of the challenge was concerned with the burden of proof on the employer's job. But the employee did not carry the burden that the employee was an employee and his complaint request is maintained but he failed to show that termination of his services was illegal or serious, no intervention was required. how to become a advocate from Nooriabad lawyer