Find a Lawyer

SINDH AGRICULTURAL SUPPLIES ORGANISATION versus JAMALUDDIN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 An employee handling the complaint application, who was a storekeeper, was accused of misconduct in relation to fertilizers and discharged from service after serving a charge sheet. Was made, but there was no mention of the fact that the job was performed on the employee, after the employee was discharged from the job for six years, the special judge acquitted him of the charges. And the employee took notice of the complaint from the department about nine months after he was acquitted. The Otis employee since served more than seven years. Upon departure from the job, the case was remanded for re-hearing and for a specific decision on whether the employee's dismissal order was effective or not, if a complaint notice was filed by the employees. Thereafter, there will be time restriction on the employer's department as well as complaints filed by the employees under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. best advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer