MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 Appellate Maintenance Employee was dismissed from his job as an Engineering Supervisor in the T&T Department, absent without leave, sued against his dismissal. After the appeal was dismissed, an appeal was filed before the Federal Service Tribunal which was dismissed and the merits of the Federal Service Tribunal were barred by the employment and the eligibility of the employees. Was dismissed, after dismissing the appeal by the Supreme Court, assuming he was found Zam, he filed a complaint under Section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, before the Labor Court, which was dismissed on the ground that the employee was not a worker and no labor court employee had any Cannot find a remedy that had already failed before the Federal Service Tribunal and the Supreme Court, the Labor Court filed an appeal before the Labor Appeal Tribunal against the employee's decision not to repeat the process at this stage. Appeal repeatedly, especially if it did not comply with the terms of Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Nor can he show that he is entitled to seek remedy under this section.
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 1995
