GHULAM MUHAMMAD DOSAT ENGINEERING LIMITED, KARACHI versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) The simplicity of the employee was acting as gatekeeper. He was involved in a criminal case and was arrested by the police because the gate keeper. 'S post could not be vacated for any length of time. In the criminal case of termination of the employee's services, the absence of the employee's duty due to his arrest cannot be declared a misdemeanor because under Section O-15 (3) of the Standing Order Ordinance, 1968, The employee was terminated due to. Permissible under Section O, 12 of the Ordinance, and only if the order was in writing and the reasons for such termination are that the employee's dismissal did not impose any obligation on the owners to approve the orders. Was gone, the employee's dismissal was valid and could not be challenged.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Nilam lawyer