Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GUL HAIDER versus AHMED ADAYA & CO. (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Complaint Request Care of the applicant / appellant who worked for the respondent company for 15 years, resigned himself, and received salary arrears, but later on behalf of the company The payment request for was not accepted. It is alleged that the applicant who resigned himself was no longer an employee of the company and was not entitled to be valued. The applicant's resignation was not related to any industrial dispute as neither his services were terminated nor he was dismissed as a result of any industrial dispute. There were no employees or laborers seeking to file their grievances; they did not seek treatment under Section 25A of the Ordinance, 1969, but they could seek general remedies under civil law.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Muzaffargarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.