Article 46 and (47 ()) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance (VI, 1968), section O15, dismissing the Labor Court's request for a service complaint, without considering the inquiry proceedings and the reports Nevertheless, they were acknowledged as true and established facts. The complainant was not examined The employee was accused of making a charge against the accountant, but said that the accountant was not presented to clarify the position in the domestic inquiry. Depending on, the employee cannot be punished severely. The employee had 24 years of service at the time of charge sheet service. And employers did not claim that the employee's role was harmed. And that he had been presented with the explanation / show cause / charge sheet several times, or had previously been warned that through such an investigation, no allegation was made against the employee and he would be reinstated on the job. In the circumstances of the charge not being proved against the employee, the Labor Court's inquiries were not in accordance with the record and the dismissed orders of the Labor Court sanctioned against the employees, the evidence was set aside and the complaint was made. Employee prayer allowed as requested, employers were instructed to comply with tribunal decision within thirty days \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2013
