GULZAR AHMED versus J&S ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Section 25 An Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section Oz 12 (3) and 13 Application for the Application for Termination of Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance Standing Order 12 (3) Under the closing orders, complaints were issued to the employees of the Establishment on the basis of organization and modernization, 1968, alleging that the junior workers were employed, but their services were not available to them. Despite being terminated, the agreement and memorandum understanding of the Validity Collective bargaining agent revealed that ten The modernization and desist offline in auyzat was arranged that, the administration had agreed to stop / department to the services, but in other departments will adjust to the department workers. There was agreement between the employees and the employers, after which the issue of modernization agreed upon the dismissal of the employees. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the reason given by the management was substantiated, and the employees themselves acknowledged that they were juniors and the management was not bound by any agreement to accommodate them. The Labor Court order of any other department was intact, but employers were instructed to calculate employees' liabilities according to the Seventh Wage Board Award, which has been entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2013
