IBRAHIM KHAN versus SAIF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI
Section 1 (4) (c), Proviso, Section Oz 10b, 11 (6) (8), 12 and 15 Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), Section 55 (4) Application for Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) (The ordinance was established in 1968 to determine the applicant's entitlement to pay a gratuity scope record that at the time less than 49 people were employed in the establishment, while according to Prodigy, section 1 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment) 4) Standing Orders (Ordinance, 1968, Standing Orders 10b, 11 (6) (8), 12 and 15) pursuant to (c) shall not apply to any industrial establishment that has not been used in any of the previous twelve dollars. ?? ??? More than a hundred people were not employed. Within months, the applicants were, by law, not entitled to a guaranty according to the Labor Court; in the circumstances, the applicants' claim was rightly rejected. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2013