Section 42 Declaration of Power of Attorney The plaintiffs (executors) were deaf and blind and had no proper consultation. The opinion of the transfer of property based on the discretion of the lawyer changed the value of the identity of the property in general power. No details were given. The owner of the suit land in the same village also had other property. In the dispute the land was located in one province and in another province the power of attorney was hanged and registered but the defendants had nothing to do with the money. Where and where paid sales money was not available to prove that all other plaintiffs' brothers served exclusive powers, the controversial Power of Attorney was used for the benefit of a very close relationship with a particular permit. The plaintiff was a minor witness to the power of the last 40 years, the attorney died and he remained in the X While the above mentioned power of attorney was informed that the dispute over the payment of money and the purchase of land was not mentioned in the power of attorney, the prosecutor was not aware of what he was talking about. Is signing because he did not consult the Power of Attorney for power. The attorney's case was dubious and its execution was not with the free and fair consent of Burden, who could have taken advantage of the powers of the attorney to prove its execution, but no strong, convincing and strong evidence was on record, but interesting witnesses. Were. To create doubts about the many contradictions, Benefiere said that the power of attorney
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
