Section 2302 (b), 4 Cri4 and Cri 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 7atat murder Mmd, attempt to assassinate Mdm, appeal joint intention against evil, reduction of death sentence, such as injury. The complainant has stated. In its preliminary report, the prosecution's injured witnesses were fully supported on all material aspects of the incident; both witnesses were subjected to lengthy and lengthy investigations, but their testimony did not contradict any evidence. That could be beneficial to the defense. He said witnesses gave the four defendants a general role in the shooting, none of them being shot, but the role of the effective fighter was made clear by the court's witness, who was an independent witness, He did not belong to anyone. Although the witnesses are related to the accused, but have no reason to falsely implicate the accused, both said that the witnesses were sealing the injured, the same incident occurred in broad daylight, and The witnesses had the perfect opportunity to witness the whole incident, which was previously tried, before the nine accused accused. The nature of the eviction and recovery of the medical evidence, the participation of the accused in this case was proved by the accused to the commission of the crime commission, it received the support of the medical evidence, the defendant's conviction was another situation. Had proven guilty. The trial court completely disregarded the accused's case as well as the circumstantial evidence, which proved the complicity and guilt of the accused, and his disclosures have led to speculation.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
