Find a Lawyer

GUL BAD SHAH versus FAZAL ELAHI

Section 13 The pre-requisite pre-requisite decision was filed by the applicant before the appellate court accepted the defendant's appeal and proceeded on the grounds that the terms of the divorce decree were not fulfilled. Case dismissed by importer dismissed. Failure to state the name of the informant, the exact place where he received the information from the informant and the notice issued by him did not reveal such fact. The pre-importer / applicant failed to examine the informant so as to deprive himself of the responsibility presented to the court for the first time the umpire / applicant filed the petition before the amending court. At the review stage, the applicant may not be all that is required to fill the lacuna or defeat the rights of the other party that was collected by the Act and the applicant was revised The revision request was dismissed.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• KAMRAN v. Haji MUHAMMAD ZAHIR KHAN 2015 PCrLJ 402
• PARVEZ AKHTAR v. Dr. SAEED-UR-REHMAN 2015 MLD 405
• SAMI ULLAH v. State 2015 PCrLJ 416
• Mst. ASIA KHATOON v. KHAN SHAREEN 2015 YLR 435
• AMIR NAWAZ KHAN v. WALI JAN 2015 CLC 441
• GHULAB KHAN v. State 2015 PCrLJ 453
• ALAM KHAN v. SHAH NAWAZ 2015 MLD 456
• COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR v. ROOH-UL-AMIN, UNIVERSITY BOOK AGENCY, BANK ROAD, MARDAN 2015 PTD 472

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

patent advocate from Tall lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes