Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365A & 34 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Abduction for ransom, general intent, terror offense, direct abduction on refusal of bail Individuals were charged in R. The victims took revenge, after being released from the clutches of the accused, in their statement filed under Section 1 Section, CRPC, before the magistrate, the accused along with the companion accused of his (minor) victim's boy. The kidnapping statement clearly suggested that the accused had a clean cut, a question related to the victim's father was involved in the commission of the crime, he had also said that he had paid Rs 5 lakh for the release of his son. Was paid in lieu of ransom, so there is reasonable grounds to believe that the accused was linked to the crime. The charge was imposed, which falls within the prohibited clause of section 497, CCP, no case of sanction of bail was granted, the accused's request for bail was dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
