Section 14 Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 12 suit for specific performance of the contract delays appeal appeal for its presentation before the appropriate forum due to incorrect advice by the cancellation counsel. Document Scope Appeal was filed before the High Court, which had returned due to a desire for legal jurisdiction, instead of presenting it to the Court of Appeal, the plaintiff filed a fresh draft appeal before the Appellate Court for its submission to the appropriate forum. The pass was returned, the lawyer had no chance of condolences, wrong or unwarranted. The delayed plaintiff was obliged to remain vigilant and to protect her right in the appropriate forum; the plaintiff was obliged to file the same appeal which was returned to the appropriate forum because it was a public document and a court appeal. Part of the record was that the plaintiff's return was not his private property and he was obliged to present it in the original state. The plaintiff could not file a new or amended appeal and he returned the appeal filed by the plaintiff. If the clause was violated, it would be considered fresh appeal and the appeal filed by the defendant was rightfully excluded. The appellate court review was dismissed under the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
