Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the trial was a daylight case of fine, riots, simple bail, refusal, on which the accused, along with his accomplice, accused the accused. , Was extremely rough with clays, sticks. And while Hecht's handle and the deceased did not heal the wounds within three hours, four witnesses, in their statements, supported the format of the trial under Section 64, CRPC, The role of each accused in the cases could not be separated for the purpose of punishment and punishment. Each of the unlawful assemblies participated in the prosecution of their common cause, with direct charges in the FIR, and all of them, including the accused, were charged with constructive responsibility. , Medical Evidence, statements of eyewitness testimony and the conspirator's remarkable conviction that the defendant's immediate treatment of the principle of persuasion was confirmed by the prosecution as a legal proceeding. 2) did not come under the purview of the accused, after the CRPC accused, remained absconding for six months. Rights and guarantees can be denied on a singular basis, with the help of medical evidence as a direct and basic account of eyewitnesses. Shi appear, and unknown primary throw fugitive, was linked to the crime the death penalty in the bail application was rejected, the
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
