The testimony of Section 6 R6 rape testimony, reduction of sentence, reduction of Victim, was directly alleged that he was charged with adultery commission which was examined at length from his Victim. , But his statement did not prove fruitful in the defense, alleging that he was a victim, since it was a relative event that was a typical day, so no identification was possible. ? And his statement was fully accepted by the Medici Legal Report, which was submitted by the Lady Doctor who examined his prosecution witness, the solitary statement of the victim was sufficient to convict the accused under the trader, if It builds confidence and gives someone the help they need. In the present case, in the present case, in addition to the unidentified extremely lengthy felony proceedings of the accused, the victim's testimony was available on record, in addition to the independent support of the witness, no doubt about the authenticity of the statements made by the prosecution's witnesses. No, the alleged contradictions were very minor in nature, and do not in any way affect the central issue. After a break of thirteen years, such minor contradictions were routine when, at the time of the occurrence of Section 6376, P.O. The PC did not exist, so it was abrogated by the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement) Ordinance, 1997, but in 2006 Following the announcement of the Etienne Protection Act, it was said that this section was reinstated at this time. Declaration of irregular decision is very popular in Section 376, PPC as provided under Section 237, CRPC, The trial court was empowered to sentence and convict the perpetrators, even if so
