Section 7 377 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of Adultery (VII of 1979I), Section 12 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 345 Abduction or abduction to target a person for unnatural lust, praise The purpose of conviction, lack of settlement was to commit adultery only with him on the charge of snatching the victim, which was also borne out by the prosecution's evidence, there is no evidence to prove that charge. The suspect was removed, or removed from legal guardianship to attract the victim. The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, the offense of offense under section 12 (Enforcement Hood) ordinance 1979 was declared an additional offense, as well as section 377, capable of PPC. He was acquitted of the charge, for lack of management, and given the age of the accused, who was 14 at the time of the commission of the crime. And the accused was declared innocent in the challan case, and said that the court was canceled by authorized jurisdiction. The first offense was a charge and a compromise was made between the complainant and the accused, although it was not the court's obligation, but could be considered as mitigating circumstance if the perpetrators of the conviction under Section 37777 were retained. According to the PPC, the trial court reduced the sentence from the proportion to seven years and the RI was fined Rs 70,000. Sentenced, limited to 3 years - RI and fines reduced to Rs 20,000 \ r \ n
