Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 380, 448 and 34 are responsible for adulterous burglary, theft of a house at home, domestic crime, joint intention to file an FIR, easily And was not clearly stated. No one was seen with the complainant's daughter committing the ina-zina bill / forced commit, the co-accused was acquitted by the trial court; at least, there were 20/25 homes in the street where the incident took place. In this, no ordinary man would try to commit ina zina bill repression with a woman who was located in a narrow, densely populated street at the door of the room / house. Immediately after the incident, the impossible residents of the street gathered at the scene to hear the voice of the complainant and the victim. But, none of the complainants appeared in the trial court to support the allegations, it was not a rule of law, but an acid test of the truth of the prosecutor's statement, no doubt It was natural. His statement, but the victim's lonely statement was neither credible, nor trustworthy, nor with the help of medical evidence, Victim could not be relied upon to record a single defendant's conviction, in such cases. Medical evidence also did not prove the commission of Xena Bill Jabber doubt beyond the reasonable shadow of doubt on the victim, nor did any police officer go to the lady doctor with the victim, who underwent a medical examination, Nor did any independent person identify her during the aforementioned examination, which was examined by the Lady Doctor. Drowned in mystery by Dr. Kimya R
