Section 20 Definition of Haramba Evidence The benefit of the doubt was filed by the complainant, according to the facts disclosed by his cook, in the presence of six persons, five with open mouths and one with a face in the complainant's house. Entered, he said, the disclosure of the accused in the FIRFR was still silent as to which culprit had pointed a pistol at the prosecutor's witness at the time of the crime, or had fired with fists and kicks. , The star of the prosecution was a witness, who was the only eyewitness. The alleged crime, in its evidence, although the accused in the court was the same, but did not assign any specific role to any of the accused, did not examine any nearby independent witness to support the incident. Was gone Made from the accused; and no evidence was available for linking the commission to the crime against the accused; a joint identification parade was held in connection with the three accused. And the witnesses of that identity, there were no eyewitnesses to the case, there was no explanation for the delay of six days in conducting the identification parade. It could not, which was not in accordance with the law, nor was the identity of a witness confirmed by the parade, its significance was lost in the circumstances and it did not rely on all arrest cases. Could have confessed that he was a relative of the complainant, and the manor was already present at the time of his arrest. In which the adviser was arranged, and the arrest was made, suspiciously one of the witnesses
