Section 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Fugitives Offering Detective Information on Spying and Transportation Offer The non-participation of private individuals to act as advisers has the benefit of suspicion of spying. The truck driver and the co-accused, who were the driver and cleaner of the aforementioned truck, were stopped at a checkpoint by the police. Bags, and each bag weighed 20kg, and the complainant and the investigating officer of the case were a policeman, and another policeman The conscience was worked out The accused and the accused were sentenced by the trial court under Article 3 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 and sentenced to three years imprisonment. The fine of Rs 10,000 on each justification is that the police were already aware of the narcotics trafficking but did not associate it with any private person. Act as a consultant complainant / police officer. In cross-examination, he confessed that when he received the information of detectives in the morning, there were different people, but he did not call on anyone to act as a prosecutor on this occasion but he failed to prove the charge against the accused. Were. And the co-accused was allowed to appeal beyond any reasonable doubt and the accused and the accomplices were acquitted of the charge by giving them the benefit of the doubt.
