Sections 395, 376, 457 and 337a (i) commit robbery, rape, domestic crime at night, for which Shuja and Khalifa appreciated the evidence. The statements of witnesses of the three stars, including adultery, remained consistent in the material details of the crimes committed by the accused, saying that the witnesses were subjected to cross-examination, but their statements They could not be shaken in any way in relation to the statements. Before the court, the proposals given in the defense were considered normal in nature, which could not do any harm to the prosecution's story, the Victim girl nominated the two accused along with her for the commission of adultery and described it all. According to the material aspects. The defense could not prove that the victim was a married woman or that the factor of enmity between the complainant and the accused also supported the fact of the commission of adultery with the affected girl. And the chemical test report was also a positive statement of the prosecution, enough to prove the commission of the crime of adultery by the mere and only accused, there was no room for false allegations of the accused whose name was immediately listed was done. The trial requires that the identity of the perpetrators be paraded, as evidenced by the evidence available on record in this regard, as to the number of offenders charged with participating in the crime. And from the number of people convicted by the court, from the number of people who participated in the crime, the gold recovered after the evidence was substantially proved by the record for the robber. Non-identifying trials
