Responsible for the commissioning of adulteration, repression, assault or misdemeanor after the inconvenience of section 452 (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII VI of 1979), sections 10 (3), 18 and 19 of the House. That is, Bill Jabbar, attempting to commit adultery, praised the evidence, not the victim of the complaint, neither in the FIR, nor in his statement, did the Zina Commission, or even the accused, commit adultery. No attempt was made, only the FIR against the above accused as well as the victim in the statement that he was present with the dagger at the time of the incident, but the trial court found the accused guilty of adultery by co-accused. Shin was convicted of facilitating the crime, and sentenced to four years in prison. By trial court, the accused under section 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 was, without evidence, set aside, the only offense against the accused was the offense, under section 452, PPC. He was sentenced to four years' imprisonment by the trial court, which was very difficult to maintain while the defendant was sentenced to four years in prison under Section 2, 2, PPC. That will be sufficiently fulfilled. In the FIR, the conviction for the crime will be maintained, the victim alleges that the co-accused tried to commit adultery with her, but during the court appearance, she improved by stating that the co-accused had committed her. Such an amendment to commit adultery is not acceptable; nor can any evidence be relied upon, especially when the victim's statement confirms the statement of the victim's father who has improved her No independent witness to present
