Sections 302 (b) and 201 Crimes (Enforcement Hood) of the Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10 (4) convictions, for which evidence of crime is missing, or misrepresentation, adultery Bill Jaber, praises effectiveness The benefit of the evidence was recorded after the FIR was delayed about 7/8 hours, the delay of which was unknown. Such delay indicates that the incident was disclosed, And the complainant took a lot of time to deliberately consult, create a false story. Post mortem examination of the deceased women was also performed approximately 22 to 28 hours after the expected death, it cannot be ruled out that the complainant interfered with her to tell a story through advice from relatives. Was done No one had alleged that they were investigating the abducted women. It is alleged that the accused were seen digging the ground and burying the bodies in the mud, unable to believe that the two women were actually killed by the accused, two women could not be killed by one person, according to the prosecution. Witnesses said two co-accused were acquitted during the investigation, and they were acquitted by the trial court case. The convicted accused cannot be comforted by the acquittal partner. The Ocular Account was not credible or trusted about the prosecutor's incident. And the accused could not be prosecuted based on the story of the alleged weakness and impossible prosecution of the incident; it was not confirmed with the help of medical evidence, which did not depend on the recovery of articles related to the deceased woman. Could go The accused
