Section 17 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 412 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) of Haraba, unlawfully reopening a retrial on a successful prosecution case. The suspicion of the reasons for the impact of the indictment on the recovery of the convicted suspect was due to the allegations made by the accused's homes, but not in compliance with the provisions of section 103, CRPC. Nor did any independent witness say that he was involved in the recovery. One of the elders of the area was concerned, was not recovered before the magistrate immediately after the restoration; the police failed to follow the legal procedure immediately after his recovery, such recovery There was no sanctity in the eyes of the law bank where the incident occurred, I was located. The busiest place, but not a single witness was ever associated with the action, which could provide any help in the mere statement of loneliness. There were no confessional statements, or other concrete evidence that could be made as evidence of the prosecutor's case situation, and the recovery of the currency notes is legally suspect, the trial court found in the absence of the accused. Was acquitted of this charge. Appeal dismissed against any wrongdoing or misdemeanor, misdemeanor, dismissed
