A III, R 4 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 was filed by the plaintiff scope plaintiff for a declaratory settlement, which was decided by the trial court, but the appellate court sought the advice of the parties. The statement was edited on. The authority that the plaintiff gave to his lawyer was never revoked by him before or at the time of the statement, the plaintiff included in the appeal authority granted by the lawyer to the lawyer not only to represent him. Rather, the plaintiff did not raise any objection to the appellate court, including the statement of agreement, regarding the statement made by his lawyer regarding the statement made by the plaintiff to the appellate court or The fraud element was rejected, in the circumstances the plaintiff did not deny his signature, the lawyer of power of attorney mentioned Neither had initiated any action against the lawyer nor informed the court about it or not. The aforesaid court had observed the integrity and purity of the judicial proceedings to set aside the order which amended it. Was excluded
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
