Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED versus SARDARAZ KHAN

Section 11 Race Judasta, The Applicable Principle of Applicability The prerequisite for establishing an application of the Judiciary would be that the material points in the dispute between the parties in the matter and the preceding litigation in the case be subject to subsequent legality. I am directly and substantially involved in the matter. In the subsequent litigation the matter was not sufficiently decided, but then it would not be a justice of the original justice or the principles of the Resost Jostata were not applied where the previous and subsequent proceedings were subject to this matter. The matter was different.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• QASIM v. The STATE 2015 YLR 1448
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2015 YLR 1465
• MUNAWAR KHAN v. State 2015 YLR 1488
• ZAHIR SHAH v. SHANZEB 2015 YLR 1505
• AMIR AKBAR KHAN v. ZARWAIZ KHAN 2015 YLR 1576
• Haji RAEES KHAN v. HAQ NAWAZ 2015 YLR 1614
• NIAZ BADSHAH v. M. NOOR HADIM 2015 YLR 1633
• ABID ULLAH v. Mst. BIBI NASEEM 2015 YLR 1646

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

divorce advocates from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes