GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY WORKS AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT PESHAWAR versus SHAMS UR REHMAN
Section 3 Constitution Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction Notice issued by the plaintiff / authority for removing the evidence on the evidence of the ban on the declaration of the High Court scope suit law And was against the truth. And it was corrupt, while defendants held that there was no jurisdiction to pass the declaration in relation to the change of suit. The suit was ruled by the tribunal. The tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction to decide the case. And he declared the property right. The plaintiff was pursuing the case in the absence of public property when issuance of distressing notice would attract the provision of section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and would be applicable in the present case when the plaintiff's case in the case of the plaintiff The claim was upheld. Recorded by the revenue authorities defense authority Ha Dee failed to prove how the provincial government entered the revenue records suit property was not acquired by the defendants / authority and in this regard There was no record that the Borden Authority had the burden of proving that the property in question was a public property authority, failing to relieve such a burden by presenting cautious and credible evidence, the tribunal took no illegal action. Did not, and based on all relevant and important evidence the facts At trial, the High Court could not reproduce the evidence while using the constitutional jurisdiction, the constitutional application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
