COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, JAMRUD ROAD, PESHAWAR versus SALMAN KHAN
Sections 2 (s), 15, 16, 156 (I) (90), 181, 187, 196 and 244 notifications were smuggled by the customs authorities to smuggle goods into Section R499 (I) / 2009, dated 13, 2009. Export of recovered foreign cloth confiscated both a vehicle and goods and a vehicle Authorities confiscated the goods, but allowed the release of the vehicle on payment of 20 redemption fines, the appellate authority amended the order and added 30 to the customs value. Also allowed the release of goods on payment of an equal redemption penalty. The Goods Customs, Federal Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed partial appeals by reducing certain duties and penalties. Under this section 187 could be justified the payment of duty and duty and tax on the person who seized the goods applicable. The Customs Act, 1969, reads with section 156 (1) (90) of the Customs Act, 1969, if a person does not leave his office to prove objectionable goods or his legitimate import or to prove legal ownership. ? Similarly, the term smuggled goods under section 2 (s) of the Customs Act 1969 will fall under mischief, any smuggled goods were provided under section 2 (s) of the Customs Act 1969, section 181 Can be released on payment of redemption penalties. Unless the relevant officer is clearly notified by the Federal Government in the absence of any compelling reasons under the first act of section 181 of the Customs Act, 1969, under the section 181 The arbitrary process of authorizing the goods owner should not be stopped. The Customs Act, 1969, in return for payment of fines, except in cases where goods are transferred to the market or goods
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
