Section 302 (b) Definition of Nature Advantage of evidence was reported after a delay of 1 hour 45 minutes, and the complainant did not provide any explanation to justify the delay and stated that the delay was due. Was used in medical discussions and consultations. The evidence did not support the complainant's version, but in fact was completely negated at the time, which seemed unnatural and impossible, denied by the medical officer, who posted the complainant's post mortem. Who had not established his presence. On the spot, there was no eyewitness to the incident, and one witness. The complainant's statement was full of contradictions and contradictions which raise serious doubts in the prosecutor's case. And the incident did not take place in the manner and manner in which he was charged with the alleged shootings with Kalashnikov, no doubt that he was to blame, and allegedly in his place. The crime was recovered from, but it is a controversial piece of evidence. It would not be safe to rely on it, when the prosecution's direct evidence was denied, the prosecution could not proceed to a motion that would otherwise have been surprising, had it not been proven that the prosecution was fugitive Couldn't get support from. The accused, when the eyewitnesses were not present on the scene and their testimony was denied, the prosecutor failed to deliver the accused's crime to the house by merely, direct and convincing evidence, the trial was serious. Born of nature
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
