Find a Lawyer

ABID ULLAH versus MST. BIBI NASEEM

Sections 10 (4) and 5, Schedule Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner Recovery and Reinstatement of Marital Rights The Family Court on the order of the Judicial and Trial Court granted the marriage under section 10 (4) of the West Pakistan Family. Dissolved. The Courts Act, 1964 but did not select an order for the return of the marriage benefits, which was under his domain, the trial court was bound to decide on the issue of the return of the marriage benefits. The time value contained therein was that under the payment both the courts had failed to act in their jurisdiction under the law, the results of both the courts were set aside the constitutional application was accepted in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• ABDUL HAMEED v. SARDARAZ KHAN 2015 YLR 1550
• AMIR AKBAR KHAN v. ZARWAIZ KHAN 2015 YLR 1576
• Haji RAEES KHAN v. HAQ NAWAZ 2015 YLR 1614
• NIAZ BADSHAH v. M. NOOR HADIM 2015 YLR 1633
• MADA MEER JAN v. State 2015 YLR 1661
• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Works and Services Department Peshawar v. SHAMS UR REHMAN 2015 YLR 1680
• COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, JAMRUD ROAD, PESHAWAR v. SALMAN KHAN 2015 PTD 1733
• Engineer MISKEEN v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PESCO 2015 YLR 1742

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocate from Doltala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes