ENGINEER MISKEEN versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PESCO
Section 114, O XLVI, R 1 has a very limited scope of review ability; such power can be used in the event of the discovery of new evidence, which may be exercised in the knowledge of the applicant even after the exercise of diligence. Could or may not be presented by the time the injunction was granted, the record may also be reviewed for any error or omission, but the review process cannot re-open a settled case. , Where the whole hearing is available. All interested parties involved in the earlier proceedings of the court were given the option that neither party is allowed to turn the review application into an appeal The primary purpose of the jurisdiction of the review was to ensure that the court corrected its error or error. In order to prevent injustice, the revision petition had already been broadly discussed and part of the wrong decision was taken and it could not identify any error or error on the face. Request to review the record was rejected
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
