SHABBIR AHMAD versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, P.R., KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Labor Court Respondents examined and examined the petitioner's plea against the appellant before testifying and submitting his affidavit in evidence, but the appellant did not inspect them. Kraska because her lawyer was ill, the Labor Court stopped the appellant's decision and decided. Without waiting for the appellant to examine the evidence for the appellant, the appellant asked the Labor Court for remand for the merit decision, and the defendant's lawyer who confessed it also showed from the record That some facts were either not proven correctly or were not presented on the record. Relevant documents The affidavit of the Labor Court was set aside and the case was returned to the Labor Court, giving the Appellant an opportunity to examine the respondents' testimony and decide the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
