Section 5A5A and Anti 34 Anti Terrorism Act (of XXVII of 1997 XX XX), Section rans (e) Abduction for abduction or ransom, general intent, praising the act of terrorism The complainant and the abductor have sued The suspects were fully involved, identified by the complainant in the identification parade, and the kidnapper identified the accused in court, evidence of the kidnapping's confidence, for the reasons that led to it. There was no enmity or intention to make false allegations in the felony offense, if the accused was identified in court, and the evidence implying that the FI Delay in filing was sufficient to resolve the delay, the complainant was fully explained, and the delay in holding the identification parade would not be fatal in the case of the prosecution, as the holding of the identification parade There was no requirement. , And it was merely proportional evidence that the evidence of the complainant and the kidnapper, the chlorosis of persecution on all material parties, had no reason to suggest that they had disposed of a lie, to make any major contradiction with the evidence and small contradictions. Not indicated, would not prove fatal in the prosecution's case, cannot be denied for the reasons raised by the defendants. It held that no exception was requested against the witnesses of the prosecution, nor was it specifically raised at the time of recording of the defendants' statement under section 342; CCPC's defense version had some indirect evidence. There was overwhelming and credible evidence that was not obtained with the help of
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
