Section 114 and OXLVII, R1 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 and Article 62 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Review of the order of consent Can request review under Article 628 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the order for consent to be filed within 20 days was forbidden as the same was filed after more than two and a half months and every An application for delay was not filed in one of the requests. The late condolences had to be explained every day that was not done. The defendant had approved the defendant's consent. The defendant did not request a review of the order but requested some amendment which I was not given any reason for the deviation. Or the scope of the review upon the consent decree was limited to errors appearing in the face of the record on which the powers of the review were granted to the High Court. A review of the options provided in the appeal can be sustained only upon the discovery of new and important evidence, or when there is an error in the face of the record, the wrong decision may be appealed to a higher forum but not the review. It is justified on the basis that the court is acting on a misconception of the law. A person who demands review of his decision or an order must make his own case in accordance with the provisions of AXLVI, R1. Should be brought in, the purpose of the CPC review cannot be to re-hear the case. Do not review unanimous orders or orders on this basis
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
