Sections 561A and 173 Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Rules, 1994, R4 (c) Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 217, 218, 409, 420, 468, 471 and 34 of the Corruption Act (1947). II), Section 5 ()) to disobey a law directive by a public servant, to create a false record by a public servant or to transcribe a written form, a violation of a criminal trust by a public servant, a false document to a false document Use, forge documents, use as counterfeit documents, common intention and corruption report bar to file a final report of litigation I demanded the termination order of the applicants / accused, under which the trial court denied the final report of litigation under section 173, CRPC to dismiss the criminal case against them. Could not have been properly evaluated without considering the material available on the record, assessing the order passed by the trial court, requiring that the material not appear to have been considered by the court, which rejected the report. Section 173, under the CRPC and has been ordered to issue a competent authority to act, has the power to drop the case after investigation itself or on the recommendation of the Anti-Corruption Committee. According to R4 (c) of the Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Rules, 1994, recommending seeking permission from a competent authority to leave the case, it appears that this case was not followed, as the accused was There was no content to be excluded. The final invoice was brought fully before the trial court, so that
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
